You can also easily write your own macro in your favorite languages. There are, of course, syntax highlighting feature for various languages, find and replace with the regular expression, auto-indentation, command-line tool, and lots of other deep functions. However, at the same time, CotEditor is neither a software only for beginners nor a typical minimal “zen-style” editor. The simply organized user interface doesn't disturb your task. It's perfect for you to write a draft version of your document or a scratch code. There are no complex configuration files that require geek knowledge so that you can access all your settings including syntax definitions and themes from a standard preferences window.ĬotEditor launches so quick that you can write your text immediately when you want to. It means, you already know how to use it even on the first launch. CotEditor looks and behaves just as macOS applications should. The application is exactly made for macOS. But these days, it's a no-vote for me, with the annoyance of the non-standard search & replace (using (foo) groups instead of (foo), etc.), painfully bad multi-document handling, lack of a project/disk browser view, lack of AppleScript, and bizarre mouse handling in the GVim version.CotEditor is a light-weight, neat, yet powerful text editor designed for editing plain-text files such as web pages (HTML, CSS), program source codes (Python, Ruby, Perl, etc.), structured texts (Markdown, Textile, TeX, etc.), or any other kind of plain-text. I used to love Vim for the ease of editing large files and doing repeated commands. Vim is fine if you have to work over ssh and the remote system or your computer can't do X11. If you're ever faced with a Windows or Linux system, it's handy to have one tool you know that works. It's not nearly as good as BBEdit, but it's a competent programmer's editor. JEdit does have the virtue of being cross-platform. I really do not get the appeal, it's marginally better than TextWrangler (BBEdit's free little brother), but if you're spending money, you may as well buy the better tool for a few dollars more. The only devs I know who like TextMate are Ruby fans. Some more obscure languages are not as well-supported in it, but for most purposes it's fantastic. I primarily use it for HTML, CSS, JS, and Python, where it's extremely strong. In 9.0, BBEdit has code completion, projects, and a ton of other improvements. The clippings system works like magic, and has selection, indentation, placeholder, and insertion point tags, it's not just dumb text.īBEdit is heavily AppleScriptable. The regexp and multiple-file Find dialogs beat anything else for usability. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones. Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub.Growth - month over month growth in stars. It handles gigantic files with ease most text editors (TextMate especially) slow down to a dead crawl or just crash when presented with a large file. The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that weve tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives. BBEdit makes all other editors look like Notepad.They work for some people, but most "advanced" users I know (myself included) hate touching them with anything shorter than a 15ft pole. You can fetch it here.Īlternatively, if you want to use Vim on OS X, I've heard good things about MacVim.īeyond those, there are the obvious TextEdit, TextMate, etc line of editors. Currently it requires Leopard with the latest release, but most people have upgraded by now anyway. It fits in well enough with the operating system, but at the same time, is the wonderful Emacs we all know and love. It is as close as you'll get to GNU Emacs without compiling for yourself. That might sound well and all, but once you realize that it completely breaks nearly every standard keybinding and behavior of Emacs, you begin to wonder why you aren't just using TextEdit or TextMate.Ĭarbon Emacs is a good Emacs application for OS X. It tries to twist and bend Emacs into something it's not (a super-native OS X app). If you ever plan on making a serious effort at learning Emacs, immediately forget about Aquamacs.
0 kommentar(er)
